Integrity Hall
Conclusion
The desire to survive exposes intellectual and scientific hypocracy.
Validation
magine that you are standing at the entrance of Integrity Hall. There is a truth at the other end that you deeply want. You desperately need it. You must have it to preserve your life, to survive. You have just three routes available to get to it. The first is through a door that opens to a route of fantasy. You immediately reject it. The only way you would take that route would to be forced down it. Route number two looks inviting. There is a treasure chest of gold you can pick up on the way. You are assured it is tax free, worth $10M. But then you are told it is booby-trapped. You are also assured there is only one chance in ten million that you will survive the walk. Glance down the hall and immediately reject that route. Your intelligence tells you that you would not survive. You have zero confidence in either route 1 or route 2. Your need and desire for the truth are both quite real. You open door 3 and stride down the path of reality logic. Even atheists and evolutionists take route 3 when their lives are at stake. But when the integrity of science is at stake they walk right through door 1 and down the path of fantasy. Some people call that inconsistent or incongruent. Others call it intellectual/scientific hypocrisy. In either case it is exposed by SIMPLE.
© Copyright 2019 Joe Nall